Toppercracker
♫
Now Playing
Ambient Radio
♫

Keep Learning?

Sign in to continue practicing.

All Verbal Ability and Reading Comprehension (VARC) 27 / 557

The escalating threat of antibiotic resistance, driven by widespread misuse in human medicine and agriculture, severely compromises the efficacy of modern healthcare, rendering once-treatable infections increasingly perilous. This biological crisis is compounded by economic disincentives for pharmaceutical companies to develop novel antimicrobial agents and the pervasive lack of harmonized global surveillance and regulatory frameworks. Consequently, addressing this multifaceted challenge demands a coordinated, multi-sectoral approach that transcends national boundaries and integrates both scientific innovation and robust governance structures.

Which of the following sentences best completes this paragraph?

A. Pharmaceutical companies must be incentivized to invest more heavily in new antibiotic research and development.
B. Without such comprehensive and unified global strategies, the world risks regressing to a pre-antibiotic era, where routine medical procedures become life-threatening and infectious diseases once again claim millions of lives annually.
C. The historical evolution of infectious diseases demonstrates humanity's consistent struggle against microbial threats.
D. Therefore, public education campaigns are crucial for informing individuals about the responsible use of antibiotics to prevent further resistance.

Correct Answer: B
Why B works: The paragraph outlines the complex nature of antibiotic resistance, moving from the biological threat to economic and governance challenges, and finally to the necessity of a coordinated global approach. Option B provides a powerful and logical conclusion by stating the dire consequences of *failing* to implement the "comprehensive and unified global strategies" implicitly called for in the preceding sentence, thus reinforcing the urgency and scope of the problem.
Why A fails: While incentivizing pharmaceutical companies is an important part of the solution, it is too narrow. The paragraph emphasizes a "multi-sectoral approach" and "robust governance structures," which goes beyond just pharmaceutical R&D. It's a specific action rather than a capstone conclusion about the overall situation.
Why C fails: This option introduces a historical context that, while relevant to the broader topic of infectious diseases, does not specifically conclude the complex discussion about antibiotic resistance, economic disincentives, and global policy failures presented in the paragraph. It shifts the scope rather than completing the argument.
Why D fails: Public education is another specific intervention that falls under the umbrella of a "multi-sectoral approach." However, like option A, it is too narrow to serve as the overarching conclusion to a paragraph that highlights the profound global and systemic risks. It addresses one facet but not the full gravity of the unaddressed challenge.

← →