Fact, Inference, and Judgement Practice

Fact, Inference, and Judgement 1 / 50

The following question has a set of four statements. Each statement can be classified as one of the following:
(i) Facts, which deal with pieces of information that one has heard, seen or read, and which are open to discovery or verification (the answer option indicates such a statement with an F)
(ii) Inferences, which are conclusions drawn about the unknown, on the basis of the known (the answer option indicates such a statement with an I)
(iii) Judgements, which are opinions that imply approval or disapproval of persons, objects, situations and occurrences in the past, the present or the future (the answer option indicates such a statement with a J)
Identify the Fact (F), Judgement (J) and Inference (I) from these sentences.

Statements:
1. According to Oxfam's 2023 report, the wealthiest one percent of the global population captured almost two-thirds of the new wealth created worldwide between 2020 and 2022.
2. The perpetuation of significantly unbalanced wealth distribution, particularly when coupled with inadequate social safety nets, is highly probable to precipitate widespread societal unrest and significant erosion of democratic institutions over time.
3. It is ethically indefensible for contemporary economic systems to permit the accumulation of vast private fortunes while global poverty and deprivation persist unabated, necessitating a radical restructuring of fiscal policies.
4. Longitudinal studies of income quintiles in various OECD countries consistently reveal that the income share of the bottom 20% has stagnated or declined, while that of the top 20% has increased significantly over the last three decades.

Options:
(A) FIJF
(B) FJJI
(C) IFJF
(D) JIFI
(E) FIFJ

Correct Answer: A

1. Statement 1 Analysis: This is a Fact (F). The statement presents verifiable data attributed to a specific source (Oxfam's 2023 report) and concerns quantifiable historical events (wealth creation between 2020 and 2022). This information can be independently verified through consulting the referenced report.

2. Statement 2 Analysis: This is an Inference (I). It draws a logical conclusion about future outcomes ("highly probable to precipitate widespread societal unrest and significant erosion of democratic institutions") based on existing trends and conditions ("unbalanced wealth distribution," "inadequate social safety nets"). The phrasing "highly probable to precipitate" signifies a prediction based on known factors, rather than a confirmed fact or a pure opinion.

3. Statement 3 Analysis: This is a Judgement (J). The statement uses strong normative and evaluative language such as "ethically indefensible" and "necessitating a radical restructuring," expressing a clear disapproval and a prescriptive opinion on how economic systems should operate. This reflects a subjective value system rather than an objective observation or a verifiable prediction.

4. Statement 4 Analysis: This is a Fact (F). The statement refers to observations from "longitudinal studies" that "consistently reveal" specific trends in income shares among different quintiles in OECD countries. These are empirically observable and verifiable data points describing historical economic shifts.

Logical Trap: A common trap lies in confusing inferences (Statement 2) with facts or judgments. While Statement 2 is based on factual premises, its predictive nature about future events, indicated by "highly probable to precipitate," makes it an inference. Similarly, Statement 3 might be mistaken for an inference by those who agree with its premise, but the strong ethical condemnation and call for action unequivocally mark it as a judgment, reflecting an opinion on what *should* be, rather than what *is* or what *will be* based on objective analysis. Statement 4, although describing a trend, is factual because the trend itself (the change in income shares) is a verifiable observation documented by studies, not a speculative future outcome.

← →

Keep Learning?