Fact, Inference, and Judgement Practice

Fact, Inference, and Judgement 24 / 50

The following question has a set of four statements. Each statement can be classified as one of the following:

(i) Facts, which deal with pieces of information that one has heard, seen or read, and which are open to discovery or verification (the answer option indicates such a statement with an F)

(ii) Inferences, which are conclusions drawn about the unknown, on the basis of the known (the answer option indicates such a statement with an I)

(iii) Judgements, which are opinions that imply approval or disapproval of persons, objects, situations and occurrences in the past, the present or the future (the answer option indicates such a statement with a J)

Identify the Fact (F), Judgement (J) and Inference (I) from these sentences.

Statements:

1. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948 at the Palais de Chaillot in Paris.

2. Given the rising disparity in digital infrastructure access across rural provinces, the literacy gap between urban and agrarian youth is expected to widen significantly by the end of the decade.

3. The modern obsession with hyper-productivity is a hollow pursuit that sacrifices the richness of contemplative thought for the sake of quantifiable output.

4. Social media conglomerates ought to be held legally accountable for the psychological externalities generated by their algorithmic engagement models.

Options:

(A) FIJJ

(B) FFJJ

(C) FIIJ

(D) FJIJ

(E) IJJI

Correct Answer: A

1. Statement 1 Analysis: This is a Fact (F). It provides specific, verifiable historical information regarding the adoption of a document, the governing body involved, the year, and the specific location. These details can be cross-referenced with official records and contain no subjective bias.

2. Statement 2 Analysis: This is an Inference (I). It draws a conclusion about an unknown future state (the widening literacy gap) based on known current data (rising disparity in digital infrastructure). The use of the phrase "is expected to" indicates a logical projection or a probable outcome derived from existing facts.

3. Statement 3 Analysis: This is a Judgement (J). The author employs qualitative and emotive language such as "hollow pursuit" and "sacrifices the richness." These terms reflect a subjective disapproval and a value-based evaluation of a social phenomenon rather than a verifiable fact.

4. Statement 4 Analysis: This is a Judgement (J). The word "ought" indicates a prescriptive opinion or a moral imperative. Any statement that suggests a duty, a necessity, or a specific course of action based on a sense of right and wrong is an expression of opinion and cannot be objectively verified.

Logical Trap: A frequent error is misclassifying Statement 2 as a Fact because it appears in an academic or sociological context. However, because it predicts a future trend that has not yet materialized, it remains an Inference. Similarly, students often mistake Statement 4 for an Inference because the "accountability" seems like a logical consequence of "psychological externalities," but the moral weight of the word "ought" makes it a Judgement.

← →

Keep Learning?