Toppercracker
♫
Now Playing
Ambient Radio
♫

Keep Learning?

Sign in to continue practicing.

Missing Sentence 2 / 54

The given sentence is missing in the paragraph below. Decide where the given sentence best fits among the options (1), (2), (3), or (4) indicated in the paragraph.

Sentence: Its provisions, crafted during the Cold War space race, primarily address state-led activities and lack clear guidelines for private commercial ventures, particularly regarding resource utilization and ownership.

Paragraph: The Outer Space Treaty of 1967 (OST) forms the bedrock of international space law, emphasizing space as the 'province of all mankind' and prohibiting national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means. (1) This foundational principle, however, is increasingly challenged by the rapid commercialization of outer space, with private entities envisioning asteroid mining, space tourism, and even orbital manufacturing. (2) Current legal interpretations are strained when confronting questions of property rights over extracted extraterrestrial resources or the liability arising from private orbital debris. (3) Some nations have unilaterally enacted domestic legislation granting property rights for resources mined by their nationals, creating a direct tension with the non-appropriation clause of the OST. (4) A comprehensive re-evaluation or the establishment of new international protocols is urgently needed to prevent a 'tragedy of the commons' in the cosmic frontier.

Correct Answer: Option 1
1. Logical Contextual Analysis:
Before Option 1: The text introduces the Outer Space Treaty (OST) of 1967 and its core principle: space as the 'province of all mankind' and the prohibition of national appropriation.
The Inserted Sentence: The sentence uses the pronoun "Its" which directly refers to the OST, and explains that the treaty's provisions are outdated (crafted during the Cold War) and insufficient for regulating private commercial ventures, especially concerning resource ownership. This provides the crucial context for *why* the foundational principle is challenged.
After Option 1: The subsequent sentence immediately states, "This foundational principle, however, is increasingly challenged by the rapid commercialization of outer space..." The inserted sentence provides the precise reason for this challenge, creating a seamless and logical flow from the introduction of the OST to the problems it faces.
2. Why the other options are incorrect:
Option 2: Placing the sentence here would disrupt the flow. The preceding sentence discusses the *emergence* of commercialization as a challenge. The inserted sentence, explaining *why* the OST is inadequate for these challenges, should logically precede the detailed description of how current legal interpretations are strained. Also, "Its provisions" would awkwardly refer to "commercialization" or "private entities" rather than the OST itself.
Option 3: This placement is too late. The paragraph has already established that legal interpretations are strained due to commercialization. Inserting a general statement about the OST's limitations at this point would be redundant and interrupt the specific examples of strained interpretations. "Its" would refer to "current legal interpretations," which doesn't fit the context of "crafted during the Cold War space race."
Option 4: This is the least suitable placement. The paragraph has already moved on to specific actions (unilateral domestic legislation) and the resulting tension. Inserting a foundational explanation of the OST's limitations here would be a backtrack, breaking the progressive argument toward the need for new protocols.
3. Placement Summary:
The sentence logically follows the introduction of the Outer Space Treaty, explaining why its principles are challenged by modern commercial space activities due to its historical context and limited scope.

← →