Now Playing
Ambient Radio

Keep Learning?

Sign in to continue practicing.

The following five sentences, labeled 1 to 5, relate to a single topic. Four of these sentences can be arranged to form a logical paragraph. Identify the sentence that does not fit with the others and enter its number as your answer.

1. The apparent paradox of altruism, wherein an individual incurs a personal fitness cost to benefit another, stands as a fundamental challenge to classical Darwinian theory primarily focused on individual reproductive success.
2. Kin selection theory elucidates this puzzle by proposing that altruistic acts are genetically favored when they enhance the reproductive success of close relatives, thereby ensuring the propagation of shared genetic material.
3. Critiques of evolutionary psychology often highlight its propensity to commit the naturalistic fallacy, conflating empirical observations of behavior with normative ethical judgments about what 'ought' to be.
4. Beyond genetic relatedness, the mechanism of reciprocal altruism explains cooperative behaviors among non-kin, contingent on the expectation of future beneficial exchanges and the establishment of trust within social groups.
5. These two robust frameworks, inclusive fitness via kin selection and direct reciprocity, collectively provide the dominant evolutionary explanations for the widespread prevalence and persistence of altruistic tendencies in various species.

Correct Answer: 3
Identification of the Theme: The core argument focuses on the primary evolutionary mechanisms (kin selection and reciprocal altruism) proposed to explain the persistence of altruism despite its apparent contradiction with individual fitness maximization.
Logical Sequence of the Coherent Paragraph: 1-2-4-5.
Sentence 1: Introduces the central problem or paradox of altruism within the framework of Darwinian evolution.
Sentence 2: Presents kin selection as the first major evolutionary mechanism that helps resolve this paradox.
Sentence 4: Introduces reciprocal altruism as a second, distinct evolutionary mechanism contributing to the explanation of altruism.
Sentence 5: Synthesizes these two mechanisms as the leading explanations for altruism's evolutionary persistence.
Why Sentence 3 is the Odd One Out: While Sentence 3 is topically related to "evolutionary psychology," it shifts the focus from explaining the *mechanisms* of altruism's evolution to a *meta-level critique* of evolutionary psychology's methodology and potential philosophical pitfalls, specifically the naturalistic fallacy. The other four sentences are directly concerned with describing and synthesizing the biological principles behind how altruism could have evolved.