Toppercracker
♫
Now Playing
Ambient Radio
♫

Keep Learning?

Sign in to continue practicing.

Paragraph Completion 21 / 53

Historical colonialism systematically reshaped global economies, extracting resources and labor from colonized territories while establishing metropolitan centers as industrial and financial hubs. This historical trajectory embedded deep structural inequalities, often fostering monoculture economies in former colonies dependent on raw material exports and hindering indigenous industrial development. Consequently, many nations that endured prolonged colonial rule continue to grapple with underdeveloped infrastructure, limited economic diversification, and vulnerability to global market fluctuations.

Which of the following sentences best completes this paragraph?

A. Modern international trade agreements often exacerbate these disparities, favoring former colonial powers.
B. Some economists argue that these nations would have remained underdeveloped even without colonial intervention.
C. Thus, addressing contemporary global economic inequality necessitates a comprehensive understanding of these entrenched historical legacies and their persistent systemic effects.
D. However, the rise of new economic powers in Asia demonstrates that historical disadvantages can be overcome with strong leadership.

Correct Answer: C
Why C works: The paragraph meticulously traces the historical roots of economic inequality from colonial practices to current vulnerabilities. Option C provides a logical and overarching conclusion by asserting that confronting modern economic inequality requires acknowledging and understanding these deep-seated historical legacies. It synthesizes the paragraph's argument into a clear call for a historically informed approach to current challenges, maintaining the academic tone and scope.
Why A fails: While potentially true, option A focuses on a specific mechanism (modern trade agreements) that exacerbates inequality. It is too narrow to serve as the overarching logical conclusion to a paragraph that details a broader historical and structural problem. It describes *how* inequality is perpetuated rather than encapsulating the full implication of the paragraph's argument.
Why B fails: Option B introduces a counterfactual argument or an alternative perspective on the origins of underdevelopment. This shifts the focus from the paragraph's established premise—that colonialism *did* create these inequalities—to a debate about whether they would have existed otherwise. It doesn't complete the existing argument but rather opens a new line of inquiry.
Why D fails: Option D introduces a counter-example (the rise of Asian economies) that, while relevant to the broader topic of economic development, does not logically conclude the specific argument presented in the paragraph. The paragraph focuses on the *persistence* of colonial-era disadvantages, and introducing a counter-narrative about overcoming these disadvantages diverges from the logical progression of the preceding sentences.

← →